South Korea’s ruling party has advanced a proposal to bring tokenized real-world assets and stablecoins under existing financial laws. The move signals a structured approach to integrating digital assets into traditional regulatory frameworks.
According to Seoul Economic Daily, the Democratic Party of Korea included these provisions in its proposed Digital Asset Basic Act. The bill would require issuers of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to place underlying assets into regulated trusts under the Capital Markets Act. Stablecoins would be classified as a “means of payment” under the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, placing them under foreign exchange oversight.
도예리 기자
Will South Korea’s Framework Accelerate RWA Adoption?
The proposal reflects a broader global trend toward formalizing tokenized assets within existing legal systems. Unlike jurisdictions developing entirely new crypto-specific regimes, South Korea is adapting current financial laws to accommodate RWAs and payment stablecoins. By comparison, regulatory fragmentation in the United States continues to delay unified treatment of similar assets across agencies.
The framework also introduces targeted constraints aimed at risk control. Small-scale stablecoin transactions for goods and services would be exempt from foreign exchange reporting, encouraging retail usage. However, the proposal would prohibit yield generation on idle stablecoin balances, limiting incentives that have driven growth in decentralized finance markets.
Additional measures focus on infrastructure and transparency. The Financial Services Commission is tasked with developing interoperability standards for stablecoins and implementing a unified disclosure system for digital assets. These requirements aim to standardize reporting and reduce operational friction across issuers and platforms.
The Digital Asset Basic Act represents South Korea’s second major attempt to regulate the sector, following delays that pushed its initial 2025 timeline. Legislative progress has been uneven, but policymakers appear to be converging on a hybrid model that blends innovation with existing compliance structures.
Attention now turns to the presidential decree that will define implementation details and enforcement scope. The next catalyst will be how quickly regulators finalize technical standards and whether market participants adapt to trust-based issuance requirements.
