South Korean police arrested two individuals over the alleged theft of 22 bitcoin from official custody, assets now worth about $1.5 million at current prices. The case exposes procedural weaknesses in how seized digital assets are stored and supervised.
The Gyeonggi Northern Provincial Police Agency took the suspects into custody on Feb. 25, according to local outlet JoongAng Ilbo. They were charged with violating the Information and Communications Network Act for allegedly leaking bitcoin from a device held at Gangnam Police Station. The coins had been seized in November 2021 during an investigation tied to the A Coin Foundation.
How Did Seized Bitcoin Leave Police Custody?
According to the report, authorities stored the confiscated assets on a cold wallet provided by the A Coin Foundation itself, rather than on a state-managed device. The suspects, reportedly linked to the foundation, are believed to have accessed the wallet using its mnemonic recovery phrase. The disappearance of the 22 BTC was only recently discovered, roughly five years after the original seizure.

The episode unfolds against a broader backdrop of increasing crypto-related enforcement in South Korea. As digital asset seizures grow in size and frequency, custody procedures have become as critical as investigative work. The reported use of a plaintiff-supplied wallet contrasts with standard evidence handling protocols that typically require independent, secured storage. Could this case prompt tighter national standards for digital asset custody?
“We are investigating the circumstances surrounding the virtual asset leak, and as the investigation is still ongoing, we cannot confirm any specifics,” a Gyeonggi Northern Provincial Police Agency official said, according to JoongAng Ilbo.
The report did not state whether the 22 BTC has been recovered.
The case also intersects with prior misconduct. The former senior superintendent who led the 2021 A Coin investigation is serving an 18-month prison sentence after being convicted on bribery charges related to the foundation in August 2024. Further disclosures from prosecutors may clarify whether systemic reforms will follow as scrutiny shifts to evidence management practices.